Savorrecipes

Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with many smaller sized companies have developed generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a large range of markets, including software application advancement, healthcare, finance, entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] style, [18] and item style. [19] However, concerns have been raised about the prospective misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the use of phony news or deepfakes to trick or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual home law issues likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and replicate copyrighted works of art. [22]

Early history

Since its beginning, scientists in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have previously been checked out by misconception, fiction and viewpoint because antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art dates back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where developers such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were described as having designed makers capable of writing text, generating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has actually flourished throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s robot produced in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been used to design natural languages given that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his very first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and analyzed the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of expert system was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of advancement and optimism in the decades since. [31] Expert system research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually used expert system to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and showing generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen developed to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI preparing systems, especially computer-aided process preparation, used to produce series of actions to reach a defined objective. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state space search and restraint complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably mature” innovation by the early 1990s. They were utilized to generate crisis action strategies for military use, [35] process prepare for manufacturing [33] and choice strategies such as in prototype self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of machine knowing utilized both discriminative models and generative models, to model and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove progress and research in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this period were normally trained as discriminative designs, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in discovering generative models, rather than discriminative ones, for complicated data such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not just class labels for images but likewise entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network made it possible for advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] leading to the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize not being watched to several tasks as a Structure model. [40]

The brand-new generative models introduced during this period enabled for large neural networks to be trained utilizing not being watched learning or semi-supervised learning, instead of the monitored knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the requirement for humans to manually label data, allowing for larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a free web application that might create persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to premium expert system art creation from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated extraordinary abilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and creates based on text descriptions, resulting in prevalent adoption amongst artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT reinvented the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to participate in natural conversations, produce creative material, help with coding, and carry out different analytical tasks captured worldwide attention and stimulated prevalent discussion about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be considered as an early (yet still incomplete) variation of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating several methods consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and movement, paving the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model offered in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, introducing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of large language designs, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The showed considerable enhancements in abilities across various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus notably surpassing leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, exceeding both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is more evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by applying without supervision artificial intelligence (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device discovering trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or kind of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language designs). They can natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation models for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on programming language text, enabling them to produce source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, launched in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The website got widespread attention for its ability to create mentally meaningful speech for different imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music together with text annotations, in order to generate brand-new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been produced, like the song Savages, which used AI to simulate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been created that can be generated using a text phrase, genre choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can create temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the motions of a robotic system to generate brand-new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research uses triggers like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out primary thinking in response to user prompts and visual input, such as selecting up a toy dinosaur when provided the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be established utilizing linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been integrated into a range of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a couple of billion criteria can work on smart devices, embedded devices, and individual computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion parameters) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of specifications can operate on laptop computer or desktop computers. To achieve an acceptable speed, designs of this size may need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion criterion version of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally include protection of personal privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That forum is among only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design standards. [93] Yann LeCun has advocated open-source designs for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computers equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are typically accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software on the market efficient in acknowledging text created by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for identifying generative AI content include digital watermarking, material authentication, info retrieval, and device learning classifier models. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually often produced false positives, mistakenly implicating trainees of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report info to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to disclose copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark created images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, constraints on personal data collection, and a guideline that generative AI should “follow socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly offered datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is secured under reasonable usage, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable use training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several lawsuits connected to the use of copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have sued Microsoft and OpenAI over the use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different question is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has likewise begun taking public input to determine if these rules need to be refined for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has raised issues from governments, companies, and individuals, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has massive potential for good and wicked at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge worldwide advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, however that its harmful use “could trigger dreadful levels of death and damage, extensive trauma, and deep psychological damage on an unthinkable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers in fact should be done by them, offered the difference between computers and people, and in between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “expert system presents an existential danger to imaginative professions” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a prospective obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and work concerns amongst underrepresented groups internationally remains a crucial element. While AI assures efficiency enhancements and skill acquisition, concerns about job displacement and prejudiced recruiting processes continue amongst these groups, as detailed in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps include mitigating biases, advocating openness, appreciating personal privacy and approval, and accepting varied groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve rerouting policy focus on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s potential for personalized teaching to optimize advantages while decreasing harms. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI models can show and magnify any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For example, a language model may presume that doctors and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are common in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “a photo of a CEO” may disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced information set. A variety of approaches for reducing bias have been attempted, such as changing input triggers [129] and reweighting training data. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s similarity utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have garnered widespread attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celeb adult videos, revenge porn, phony news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated responses from both market and government to spot and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to create questionable statements in the singing design of celebrities, public officials, and other popular individuals have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In reaction, business such as ElevenLabs have mentioned that they would deal with mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have generated from AI-generated music. The very same software application used to clone voices has actually been used on well-known musicians’ voices to create tunes that simulate their voices, acquiring both significant appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have also been utilized to develop better quality or full-length variations of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been used to create new digital artist characters, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to get record deals at major labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise developing artists which develop unrealistic or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop reasonable fake content has actually been made use of in numerous types of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos become perfectly realistic, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, potentially causing uncritical approval of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, big language models and other kinds of text-generation AI have been used to produce phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to improve rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have created large language models concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, allowing assailants to obtain aid with damaging demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have shown that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety restrictions at low cost. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous amount of computing power. Usually just Big Tech business have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have actually expressed issues about the environmental impact that the development and deployment of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater used for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electricity usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these impacts may increase as these models are integrated into widely utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring prospective environmental costs prior to model development or data collection, [165] increasing efficiency of information centers to minimize electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more efficient machine discovering designs, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models require to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental impact of these designs, [168] [167] regulating for transparency of these designs, [167] regulating their energy and water use, [168] motivating scientists to release data on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject matter professionals who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: “substandard or undesirable A.I. content in social media, art, books and … in search results.” [172] Journalists have expressed issues about the scale of low-quality created material with regard to social media content moderation, [173] the monetary rewards from social media companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical term paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover greater quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of websites, were machine equated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were translated throughout at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had actually stopped upgrading the information for numerous factors: high expenses for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to a surge of AI-generated content across multiple domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of recently published computer science documents and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI designs, problems in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI model specifically on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, causes progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a “design collapse” after several models. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the value of data gathered from real human interactions with systems might become increasingly important in the presence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is frequently utilized as an alternative to data produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be released to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while protecting user privacy, [188] including for structured data. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been used to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing accident. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “stealthily genuine”, and the interview included a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired quickly afterwards amid the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have actually released short articles whose material and/or byline have actually been verified or believed to be produced by generative AI models – frequently with incorrect content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce posts for a lot of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had produced 10s of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, triggering issues about job losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually traditionally been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based upon input information provided, such as “details of existing events”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch explained it as” [taking] for approved the effort that entered into producing accurate and artful news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay little publishers to write three posts daily utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the knowledge or permission of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the published posts to be identified as being produced or helped by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with articles produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed issue that generative AI could have a harmful effect on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business creating a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to prospective mistakes around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over decreasing audience trust, outlets around the globe, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published guidelines around how they plan to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “generally human with some help from AI”. The results of global surveys reported that people were more uneasy with news topics consisting of politics (46%), crime (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that replicates discussion
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of large language model
Large language design – Kind of maker knowing model
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to create music
Generative AI porn – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is created algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of info retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in device knowing

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, services, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, people win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer helped procedure preparation: the modern survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI planner based upon the HSTS preparation structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise add an architectural element explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with unsupervised knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type considering that ’15. ai‘ launched in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates possible pictures of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that combines 6 kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI model it states can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI design – and a clever brand-new way to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and threats of structure models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “high-quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical difficulties that they experienced around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer sparks argument over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model construct times with brand-new AI-driven part development method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is rudimentary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software application … the brand-new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be available in a few of the business’s most popular organization apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will end up being one of the most important features for creative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 by yourself machine or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created in your area, so you don’t need a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in the house, you will require a computer system construct with a powerful GPU that can manage the big quantity of information and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I quite much only trust 2 LLM evals today” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with strict U.S. export requirements that limit how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to acknowledge fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be difficult. That’s a huge issue for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI material for security, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers choose tougher AI guidelines as draft transfer to last”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to apply just to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise accepting the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Going”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals think about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market reportedly annihilated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly demands AI policies to secure authors and the works they produce. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has become a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently called SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system presents an existential hazard to imaginative professions, and all actors and performers deserve agreement language that protects them from having their identity and talent made use of without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the globe are stressed over AI being a risk to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are biased. Can reasoning conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the challenges of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech might begin a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran use AI to boost anti-U.S. impact projects, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, say professionals”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get ready for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ forecasts the most significant threat is that deepfakes will eventually end up being boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of artificial intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and primarily secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design suddenly tries to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and often recognizable. Large language models create text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, even though there is none, and their output turn up all over,” she composed. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dive,” in a manner that individuals do not, which has actually tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found errors in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Concerning your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI article about women’s use of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of local news sites is publishing AI-written short articles under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter caught utilizing expert system to create fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will upgrade AI feature after inaccurate news alerts”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are shocked to discover their name and work have actually been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already getting into Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators alert AI might lead to ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta ignored news. Now the company’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.